CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

S v Sikhala (HMA 4-20, CRB 4/20) [2020] ZWMSVHC 4 (14 February 2020);

 

 

THE STATE

versus

JOB SIKHALA

 

 

 

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MAWADZE J

MASVINGO, 3 and 14 FEBRUARY 2020

 

                                                                

 

Criminal Trial – Exception

 

Assessors

  1. Mr Mutomba
  2. Mr Gweru

 

T. Zvekare with Mrs Muhwandavaka & T. Chikwati, for the state

S v Phiri & Anor (HMA 33-20, B29-20) [2020] ZWMSVHC 33 (10 July 2020);

 

 

EDMORE PHIRI

and

TATENDA PHIRI

versus

THE STATE

 

 

 

 

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MAWADZE J

MASVINGO, 3 February & 10 July, 2020

 

                                                                

 

Bail Application

 

 

 

T. Mbwachena, for both accused applicants

Ms M. Mutumhe, for the state

 

 

 

 

S v Nguvo (HMA 35-20, CRB MSVR 22-20) [2020] MSVHC 35 (16 June 2020);

 

THE

 

versus

 

FORGET NGUVO

 

 

 

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

ZISENGWE J

MASVINGO 16 JUNE, 2020

 

                                                                

 

Criminal Review

 

 

 

ZISENGWE J:            The whole point of this review judgement is to once again stress the importance, in a contested criminal trial, of observing the peremptory provisions of section 200 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, [Chapter 9:07].

S v Mazuru (HMA 36-20) [2020] ZWMSVHC 36 (16 July 2020);

GODWIN MAZURU

 

Versus

 

THE STATE

 

 

 

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MAWADZE J AND ZISENGWE J

MASVINGO 15 & 16 JULY, 2020

 

                                                                

 

Criminal Appeal

 

 

O. Mafa, for the appellant

E Mbavarira, for the respondent

 

 

 

MAWADZE J:           The issue which arises in this matter is rather a novel one.

S v Tshuma (HB 11-20, HCAR 71/20 Ref CRB GKP 2031/10) [2020] ZWBHC 11 (13 February 2020);

THE STATE

 

Versus

 

GILBERT TSHUMA

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

KABASA J

BULAWAYO 13 FEBRUARY 2020

 

Review Judgment

            KABASA J:   The accused pleaded guilty to contravening section 140 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act Chapter 9:23.

S v Shoko & Anor (HH 409-20, CRB, CHG 1450-51/19) [2020] ZWHHC 409 (15 June 2020);

 

 

 

THE STATE

versus

 KUDAKWASHE JOE SHOKO

and

CAIN PEMBEDZA

 

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MUSAKWA J

HARARE, 15 June 2020

 

Criminal Review

 

MUSAKWA J: The record of proceedings was submitted by the scrutinizing magistrate who drew attention to some procedural irregularities in the manner in which trial was conducted, how the condition of suspension of sentence was formulated and the inadequacy of the sentence that was imposed.

S v Kambarami (HB 119-20, HCA 05/19 XREF HCA (COND) 78/18 XREF BYO P 1981/18) [2020] ZWBHC 119 (18 June 2020);

TINASHE KAMBARAMI

 

Versus

 

THE STATE

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

 

MAKONESE AND MABHIKWA JJ

 

BULAWAYO 15 AND 18 JUNE 2020

 

 

Criminal Appeal

 

 

D Moyo, for the appellant

B Gundani, for the respondent

           

Pages

Subscribe to CRIMINAL PROCEDURE