Icon Alloys (Pvt) Ltd. & Another v Gwaradzimba N.O. & Others (HMA 30 -17 , HC 73/17) [2017] ZWMSVHC 30 (20 June 2017);
1
HMA 30 -17
HC 73/17
ICON ALLOYS [PVT] LTD
and
TEID HARDWARE [PVT] LTD
versus
ARAFAS MTAUSI GWARADZIMBA N.O.
and
SMM HOLDINGS [PVT] LTD
and
MASVINGO RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL
and
SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE
HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE
MAFUSIRE J
HARARE, 13 March 2017 & 20 June 2017
Urgent chamber application
The court considered an urgent application, which was heard in chambers, to prevent the applicants’ eviction from their mining claims.
The mining claims, which were abandoned, were owned by the second respondent. Pursuant to the abandonment, the mining claims were opened up to prospecting third parties.
The applicants claimed that they applied to the relevant authority and were granted a lease of the disputed mining claims. Consequently, they argued that they should not be evicted.
The court, therefore, had to determine whether the eviction of the applicants was lawful.
The court found that the applicants failed to provide evidence showing that they had obtained a lease. It also found that the second respondent, which purportedly abandoned the mining claims in dispute, had been placed under a reconstruction order in terms of the Reconstruction of State-Indebted Insolvent Companies Act [CAP 24:27], which had the effect of voiding every disposition of the property, without the approval of the administrator. In this instance, the administrator did not approve the abandonment. As such, it was null and void, and was not open for prospecting.
The court found that the applicants’ manager and principal officer in person, not the applicants themselves, featured in the provided documents and that the eviction was against that person. The applicants themselves never acquired a right over the mining claims.
Finally, the court found the applicants were sluggard and failed to approach the court in good time.
Accordingly, the application was dismissed.