Assembly

Habakuk Trust v Clerk of Parliament & 2 Ors (HB 118-20, HCB 899/20) [2020] ZWBHC 118 (18 June 2020);

HABAKUK TRUST

 

Versus

 

CLERK OF PARLIAMENT

 

And

 

PARLIAMENT OF ZIMBABWE

 

And

 

MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL &

PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

MOYO J

BULAWAYO 15 AND 18 JUNE 2020

 

Urgent Chamber Application

 

J. Sibanda for the applicant

The Zimbabwe Chamber for informal Workers & 2 Others v Minister of Health and Child Care & 6 Others (HH 334-20, HC 2221/20) [2020] ZWHHC 334 (26 May 2020);

THE ZIMBABWE CHAMBER FOR INFORMAL WORKERS

and

PASSENGER ASSOCIATION OF ZIMBABWE

and

CONSTANTINE CHAZA

versus

MINISTER OF HEALTH AND CHILD WELFARE

and

MINISTER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, RURAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

and

MINISTER OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

and

MINISTER OF PUBLIC SERVICE LABOUR AND

SOCIAL WELFARE

and

MINISTER OF TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE

DEVELOPMENT

and

THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE

and

Democratic Assembly for Restoration and Empowerment & 3 Others v Saunyama N.O & 3 Others (CCZ 9/18, Civil Appeal No. CCZ 5/18) [2018] ZWCC 9 (17 October 2018);

This was an application seeking a determination as to whether, section 27 of the Public Order and Security Act (POSA), banning any public processions or demonstrations in the Harare Central Business District for two weeks, was constitutional.

The court determined the constitutional validity of section 27 of the POSA. The court found that the provision infringes the right to freedom of demonstration guaranteed by section 59 of the Constitution. The provision failed the constitution validity test for a law limiting fundamental rights and freedoms. Section 27 was held to be unfair, unreasonable, unjustifiable and an unnecessary manner. 

In conclusion, the court held that section 27 of POSA was unconstitutional. The High Court declaration of constitutional invalidity of section 27 of POSA was suspended for 6 months from the date of judgment. The matter was remitted to the Supreme Court for the determination of the appeal, and each party was ordered to bear its cost.

Subscribe to Assembly